Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery

In Pursuit of Patient-Centered Innovation: The Role of Professional Organizations No abstract available

Surgeon-Team Separation in Robotic Theaters: A Qualitative Observational and Interview Study Background The rapid uptake of robotic surgery has largely been driven by the improved technical aspects of minimally invasive surgery including improved ergonomics, wristed instruments, and 3-dimensional vision. However, little attention has been given to the effect of physical separation of the surgeon from the rest of the operating team. Purpose The aim of this study was to examine in depth how this separation affected team dynamics and staff emotions. Methods Robotic procedures were observed in 2 tertiary hospitals, and laparoscopic/open procedures were added for comparison; field notes were taken instantaneously. One-to-one interviews with theater team members were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Qualitative analysis was conducted via grounded theory approach using NVIVO11. Results Twenty-nine participants (26 interviewed) were recruited to the study (11 females) and 134 (109 robotic) hours of observation were completed across gynecology, urology, and colorectal surgery. The following 3 main themes emerged with compounding factors identified: (a) communication challenge, (b) immersion versus distraction, and (c) emotional impact. Compounding factors included the following: individual and team experience, staffing levels, and the physical theater environment. Conclusions Our emergent theory is that “surgeon-team separation in robotic theaters poses communication challenges which impacts on situational awareness and staff emotions.” These can be ameliorated by staff training, increased experience, and team/procedure consistency.

Prolapse Recurrence After Sacrocolpopexy Mesh Removal: A Retrospective Cohort Study Objectives There is limited literature regarding outcomes after sacrocolpopexy mesh removal. We sought to compare the proportion of prolapse recurrence in women after sacrocolpopexy mesh removal with women who underwent sacrocolpopexy without subsequent mesh removal. We hypothesize that more women will experience prolapse recurrence after mesh removal. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent sacrocolpopexy mesh removal between 2010 and 2019. These patients were time matched with women who had a sacrocolpopexy but did not undergo mesh removal. Prolapse recurrence was defined as the leading edge past the hymen or retreatment. Analysis was done using χ2, Wilcoxon rank-sum, or t test with a Cox proportional hazard model to assess the association between mesh removal and time to recurrence. Results We identified 26 mesh removals, which were matched with 78 patients without mesh removal. The most common indications for mesh removal were exposure (69.2%) and pain (57.7%). Women who underwent mesh removal were more likely to have Mersilene mesh (19.2% vs 1.3%, P = 0.006). Recurrence occurred in 46% of women who had mesh removal compared with 7.7% in those without (P < 0.001). When adjusted for age, parity, menopause, smoking, and diabetes status, those who had mesh removal had a 15 times higher hazard of prolapse recurrence (adjusted hazard ratio = 15.4, 95% confidence interval = 4.3–54.8, P = <.0001). Conclusions When compared with time-matched controls, women who underwent sacrocolpopexy mesh removal had a significantly higher proportion of prolapse recurrence. Prospective studies are needed to further explore the utility of concomitant prolapse repair at the time of mesh removal.

Prevalence of Female Urinary Incontinence in Crossfit Practitioners and Associated Factors: An Internet Population-Based Survey Objectives CrossFit comprises a set of high-intensity, high-impact exercises that includes movements that may increase intra-abdominal pressure and cause involuntary loss of urine. There is scant literature about the prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) in female crossfitters, as well as its associated factors. Methods A population-based Internet survey stored in a website created with information on the benefits and risks of CrossFit for women’s health (https://crosscontinencebr.wixsite.com/crosscontinencebr) invited female crossfitters. In total, 551 women answered an online questionnaire, and the demographic variables (age, marital status, and parity), anthropometric data (weight, height, and body mass index), and the presence of UI during exercises were also investigated. The prevalence of UI and its associated factors were calculated using a logistic regression model. The significance level was set at 5%. Results The overall prevalence of UI during CrossFit exercises was 29.95%, and most women with UI reported loss of urine during at least one exercise (16.70%). Women with UI were older (33.77 ± 8.03 years) than those without UI (30.63 ± 6.93 years; P < 0.001). Double under (20.15%) and single under (7.99%) were the exercises that were most frequently associated with UI and also the only variables that remained in the final model that caused UI. The duration of CrossFit practice, number of days per week practicing CrossFit, daily time practice, previous vaginal delivery, and mean birth weight were not statistically associated with UI. Conclusions One-third of female crossfitters presented with UI during exercise. Double under was the exercise that was the most associated with UI.

The Stress Urinary Incontinence in CrossFit (SUCCeSS) Study Objective To evaluate the prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence (UI) in women who participate in CrossFit classes compared with women who participate in non-CrossFit group fitness classes. Methods The authors conducted a cross-sectional study of women who participate in either CrossFit or non-CrossFit group fitness classes using an online survey. Participants provided demographic information and completed the Incontinence Severity Index and Urinary Distress Inventory. Participants were recruited from local CrossFit and non-CrossFit gyms, online via social media, and an electronic CrossFit Newsletter. Associated comorbidities, exercises associated with UI, and coping mechanisms for urinary leakage were also assessed. Results Four hundred twenty-three women meeting inclusion criteria completed the survey, including 322 CrossFit participants and 101 non-CrossFit participants. We found that CrossFit participants were older than non-CrossFit participants and more likely to self-identify as non-Hispanic white. CrossFit participants more commonly reported UI (84% vs 48%, P = <0.001), higher severity of UI (Urinary Distress Inventory score: 20.8 vs 12.5, P < 0.001), and specifically more stress UI (73% vs 47%, P < 0.001). Weightlifting and jumping movements were the most common exercises associated with UI in CrossFit participants. Age and participation in CrossFit are significant and independent predictors of UI. Conclusions More than 80% of CrossFit participants reported UI and half of these reported moderate-severe UI, as compared with women who participate in non-CrossFit classes, less than half of whom reported UI with a small minority reporting moderate-severe UI. Exercises most associated with UI were jumping and weightlifting.

An Alternative Approach to Posterior Colporrhaphy Plication Using Delayed Absorbable Unidirectional Barbed Suture No abstract available

Presacral Anatomy in Women With a Horseshoe Kidney Objective Horseshoe kidney (HSK) is the most common renal fusion defect that can alter vascular and upper urinary tract anatomy. Anatomic variations in the presacral space can make surgical dissection very challenging. The aim of this study was to characterize presacral anatomy in women with HSK. Methods Large academic centers’ database was queried to identify imaging studies in adult women with HSK. Available multiplanar computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging images were reviewed, and relevant vascular and upper urinary tract anatomy was measured and compared with published normal values. Study population was compared with the normal controls using Student t test, χ2 test, or Fisher exact test as appropriate. Results One hundred seventy-eight women were identified initially, and 20 confirmed to have HSK on imaging. The mean ± SD age was 54.5 ± 16.9 years, and body mass index was 27.3 ± 7.5 kg/m2. Women with HSK had a narrower angle of aortic bifurcation (39.1 ± 18.7 degrees vs 55.6 ± 4.5 degrees, P = 0.014); the right ureter was closer to midline (22.9 ± 8.8 mm vs 32.3 ± 1.2 mm, P < 0.001) when compared with normal controls anatomy. In 40% of women with HSK, the bifurcation of the vena cava was below the level of L5 in contrast to the 8% in the normal population (P < 0.001). In 60% of women with HSK, the inferior pole of the kidney was at or below L5. Conclusions Ureteral, renal, and vascular anatomic alterations in women with HSK may make presacral surgical anatomy challenging by obscuring the anterior longitudinal ligament anchoring point. Preoperative imaging is warranted to determine the feasibility of female pelvic reconstructive surgery in HSK patients.

Complications After Reperitonealization of Mesh at Time of Sacrocolpopexy: A Retrospective Cohort Study Objectives To determine if there is a difference in rates of surgical complications among patients who have reperitonealization of mesh versus no reperitonealization at time of sacrocolpopexy. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy at an academic medical center between 2008 and 2017. The medical record was reviewed for the operative method of sacrocolpopexy, concomitant surgeries, intraoperative or postoperative complications, and readmissions. Groups were compared on whether mesh was reperitonealized under pelvic peritoneum or not. Results A total of 209 patients underwent sacrocolpopexy, with mesh reperitonealization performed in 115 (55%). Demographics were similar in both groups, except race/ethnicity and stage of prolapse. The majority (190 [91%]) of surgeries included concomitant procedures. A total of 18 intraoperative or postoperative complications (8.6%) were recorded. Relative risk of complication with mesh reperitonealization is 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.1–1.70). Complications for subjects without mesh reperitonealization included 4 cystostomies, 1 urethrotomy, 3 postoperative ileuses, and 1 small bowel obstruction. Among subjects with mesh reperitonealization, complications included 5 cystotomies, 2 proctotomies, 1 ureteral obstruction, and 1 small bowel obstruction. Rates of hospital readmission among both groups were not significantly different, with 3.2% of subjects without mesh reperitonealization versus 3.5% of mesh reperitonealization patients (P = 0.91) (relative risk, 1.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.38–2.56). Conclusions There is no significant difference in rates of complications or readmissions among patients with and without mesh reperitonealization at time of sacrocolpopexy. The only intraoperative complication solely attributed to mesh closure was a case with ureteral obstruction at time of reperitonealization.

When to Remove the Indwelling Catheter After Minimally Invasive Sacrocolpopexy? CARESS (CAtheter REmoval after Sacrocolpopexy Surgery) Objective The aim of the study was to determine the best practice guidelines regarding the use of indwelling catheters after minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy. Methods Multicenter (3 sites) randomized control trial comparing the standard overnight indwelling urethral catheterization (group 2) with removal of catheter immediately after surgery (group 1). Our primary outcome is the need for recatheterization. Secondary outcomes include the number of patients discharged with a catheter, length of hospital stay, number of urinary tract infections, patient satisfaction/pain scores, and whether patients would use the same treatment again. Results There were 32 patients (43.8%) in group 1 and 41 patients (56.2%) in group 2. On average, patients in group 1 required straight catheterization 0.8 (SD = 0.9) times versus 0.6 (SD = 0.9) times for group 2 (P = 0.239). The number of days with a catheter between the 2 groups was not statistically significant. There was no statistical significance between group 1 and group 2 in terms of operative time, times to leave the operating room, and hospital. Zero patients in group 1 and 2 patients in group 2 had a urinary tract infection. After dividing the groups based on whether or not they underwent a transvaginal tape procedure, the final results were similar. Conclusions We did not observe a difference in the risk of recatheterization or discharge home with a urinary catheter between the 2 groups. Addition of transvaginal tape to sacrocolpopexy did not show a difference in the risk of recatheterization. One reason for the lack of difference between the 2 groups could be due to a lack of power in our study.

Implantation Time Has No Effect on the Morphology and Extent of Previously Reported “Degradation” of Prolene Pelvic Mesh Objectives Prolene polypropylene (“Prolene”) meshes demonstrate no in vivo degradation, yet some claim degradation continues until no more Prolene polypropylene can be oxidized. We studied whether implantation time affects the morphology/extent of previously reported as cracking/degradation of completely cleaned Prolene explants. Methods Urogynecological explants (248 patients) were collected. After excluding non-Prolene/unknown meshes and those without known implantation times, completely cleaned explants (n = 205; 0.2–14.4 years implantation) were analyzed with light microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Based on implant times and storage (fixative or dry), representative specimens were randomly selected for comparison. Controls were unused (“exemplar”) TVT specimens with and without intentional oxidation via ultraviolet light exposure. Results Prolene explants included 31 dry (18 TVT; 7 Prolift; 4 Gynemesh; 2 others) and 174 wet (87 TVT; 47 Prolift; 10 Gynemesh; 30 others) specimens. Specimens had similar morphologies before cleaning. Progressive cleaning removed tissue and cracked tissue-related material exposing smooth, unoxidized, and nondegraded fibers, with no visible gradient-type/ductile damage. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of the explants confirmed progressive loss of proteins. Cleaning intentionally oxidized exemplars did not remove oxidized carbonyl frequencies and showed deep cracks and gross fiber rupture/embrittlement, unlike the explants and nonoxidized exemplars. Conclusions If in vivo Prolene degradation exists, there should be wide-ranging crack morphology and nonuniform crack penetration, as well as more cracking, degradation, and physical breakage for implants of longer implantation times, but this was not the case. There is no morphologic or spectral/chemical evidence of Prolene mesh degradation after up to 14.4 years in vivo.