Maintenance Therapy in Metastatic Solid Tumors: Innovative Strategy or Simple Second-line Treatment? Managing metastatic diseases involves defining the best strategy that is supposed to take into account both efficacy and quality of life. To this end, clinicians use stop and go or maintenance strategies. As a matter of fact, 2 maintenance strategies can be distinguished: continuation maintenance using a drug already present in induction treatment and switch maintenance with a newly introduced drug. Several drugs have been approved as maintenance therapy with several current indications in solid tumors. Questions remain concerning such strategies, notably duration, cost, tolerability, and shortcut between switch maintenance and early second line. If the concept of maintenance strategy remains trendy with numerous trials ongoing, several issues are still pending. The aims of this review were to accurately define and describe the various facets of maintenance therapy through its several indications in real life and then to discuss the future challenges of maintenance therapy in oncology.

Exceptional Responders in Oncology: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Patient Level Data Purpose: We aim to systematically review and analyze the available literature on “exceptional responders” in oncology. We hypothesize that survival or patients with an exceptional response may be predicted based on clinical factors. Materials and Methods: A PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE selection protocol was used to find studies that reported oncology patients with an exceptional response. A total of 333 initial articles were screened, and 76 articles were included, accounting for 85 patients. The primary outcome was survival after exceptional response therapy (ERT). The secondary outcome was survival since diagnosis. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted for both outcomes with 17 covariates. Results: The median age was 52 years (interquartile range, 35-66 y), 51.8% were male individuals, 18 (21.2%) had lung cancer, and 1 patient (1%) met all National Cancer Institute criteria for exceptional response. The most common treatment resulting in exceptional response was a form of chemotherapy (49.2%) followed by targeted therapy (26.8%) and radiation therapy (7.7%). The median time from diagnosis to initiation of ERT was 7.92 months (interquartile range, 0-24.72 mo). On multivariate analysis of survival after initiation of ERT, there were no predictors of exceptional response. On multivariate analysis of survival since diagnosis, predictors of prolonged survival included time between diagnosis and ERT initiation (hazard ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.87; P=0.0124) and single prior surgery versus none (0.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.98; P=0.04853). Conclusions: There were no clinically apparent patient or treatment factors that predicted favorable survival following ERT; instead, reporting of exceptional response appears to be biased.

The Effect of Time to Postoperative Radiation Therapy on Survival in Resected Merkel Cell Carcinoma Objectives: Delays from surgery to adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT) are associated with poorer prognosis in multiple neoplasms. Presently, no data exist for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). The authors sought to assess the time interval from surgery to aRT and effect on outcomes in MCC. Materials and Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for histologically confirmed nonmetastatic MCC status post resection and aRT diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 who received aRT within 24 weeks of surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed univariate overall survival (OS); multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling assessed multivariate OS; χ2 and logistic regression assessed differences in baseline characteristics and predictors of delayed aRT. Results: Of 5952 patients meeting criteria, 13% commenced aRT within 4 weeks, 48% between 4 and 7 weeks, 23% between 8 and 11 weeks, 11% between 12 and 15 weeks, and 6% between 16 and 24 weeks. There were no differences in OS on the basis of the surgery-aRT interval (P=0.99). Predictors of worse OS on the multivariate analysis included advanced age, greater comorbidities, male sex, lower regional income, earlier year of diagnosis, more advanced tumor and nodal staging, positive margins, head and neck location, and treatment at community facilities (P<0.05 for all). Factors predictive of delayed aRT were identified. Subset analyses on these factors, such as receipt of chemotherapy or positive lymph nodes, did not demonstrate that the timing of aRT affected survival (P≥0.37). Conclusion: This study of a contemporary national database revealed that delays from resection to aRT were not associated with survival in MCC, somewhat discordant from other malignancies such as squamous cell carcinoma.

Artificial Intelligence Estimates the Importance of Baseline Factors in Predicting Response to Anti-PD1 in Metastatic Melanoma Objective: Prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma has dramatically improved over recent years because of the advent of antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein-1 (PD1). However, the response rate is ~40% and baseline biomarkers for the outcome are yet to be identified. Here, we aimed to determine whether artificial intelligence might be useful in weighting the importance of baseline variables in predicting response to anti-PD1. Methods: This is a retrospective study evaluating 173 patients receiving anti-PD1 for melanoma. Using an artificial neuronal network analysis, the importance of different variables was estimated and used in predicting response rate and overall survival. Results: After a mean follow-up of 12.8 (±11.9) months, disease control rate was 51%. Using artificial neuronal network, we observed that 3 factors predicted response to anti-PD1: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (importance: 0.195), presence of ≥3 metastatic sites (importance: 0.156), and baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) > upper limit of normal (importance: 0.154). Looking at connections between different covariates and overall survival, the most important variables influencing survival were: presence of ≥3 metastatic sites (importance: 0.202), age (importance: 0.189), NLR (importance: 0.164), site of primary melanoma (cutaneous vs. noncutaneous) (importance: 0.112), and LDH > upper limit of normal (importance: 0.108). Conclusions: NLR, presence of ≥3 metastatic sites, LDH levels, age, and site of primary melanoma are important baseline factors influencing response and survival. Further studies are warranted to estimate a model to drive the choice to administered anti-PD1 treatments in patients with melanoma.

Phase I Study of Sorafenib and Vorinostat in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Objectives: Preclinical data suggest histone deacetylase inhibitors improve the therapeutic index of sorafenib. A phase I study was initiated to establish the recommended phase 2 dose of sorafenib combined with vorinostat in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Materials and Methods: Patients received vorinostat (200 to 400 mg by mouth once daily, 5 of 7 d) and sorafenib at standard or reduced doses (400 mg [cohort A] or 200 mg [cohort B] by mouth twice daily). Patients who received 14 days of vorinostat in cycle 1 were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: Sixteen patients were treated. Thirteen patients were evaluable for response. Three patients experienced DLTs, 2 in cohort A (grade [gr] 3 hypokalemia; gr 3 maculopapular rash) and 1 in cohort B (gr 3 hepatic failure; gr 3 hypophosphatemia; gr 4 thrombocytopenia). Eleven patients required dose reductions or omissions for non-DLTtoxicity. Ten patients (77%) had stable disease (SD). The median treatment duration was 4.7 months for response-evaluable patients. One patient with SD was on treatment for 29.9 months, and another patient, also with SD, was on treatment for 18.7 months. Another patient electively stopped therapy after 15 months and remains without evidence of progression 3 years later. Conclusions: Although some patients had durable disease control, the addition of vorinostat to sorafenib led to toxicities in most patients, requiring dose modifications that prevented determination of the recommended phase 2 dose. The combination is not recommended for further exploration with this vorinostat schedule in this patient population.

ENvironmental Dynamics Underlying Responsive Extreme Survivors (ENDURES) of Glioblastoma: A Multidisciplinary Team-based, Multifactorial Analytical Approach Although glioblastoma (GBM) is a fatal primary brain cancer with short median survival of 15 months, a small number of patients survive >5 years after diagnosis; they are known as extreme survivors (ES). Because of their rarity, very little is known about what differentiates these outliers from other patients with GBM. For the purpose of identifying unknown drivers of extreme survivorship in GBM, the ENDURES consortium (ENvironmental Dynamics Underlying Responsive Extreme Survivors of GBM) was developed. This consortium is a multicenter collaborative network of investigators focused on the integration of multiple types of clinical data and the creation of patient-specific models of tumor growth informed by radiographic and histologic parameters. Leveraging our combined resources, the goals of the ENDURES consortium are 2-fold: (1) to build a curated, searchable, multilayered repository housing clinical and outcome data on a large cohort of ES patients with GBM; and (2) to leverage the ENDURES repository for new insights into tumor behavior and novel targets for prolonging survival for all patients with GBM. In this article, the authors review the available literature and discuss what is already known about ES. The authors then describe the creation of their consortium and some preliminary results.

Cardiac Toxicity in Operable Esophageal Cancer Patients Treated With or Without Chemoradiation Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate predictors of cardiac events in esophageal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NA CRT) followed by surgery compared with surgery alone. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively identified patients treated for esophageal cancer between 2006 and 2016. A total of 123 patients were identified; 70 were treated with surgery alone, and 53 were treated with NA CRT. Cardiac events were scored based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03), and dosimetric data was compiled for all patients who received radiation. Univariate analysis and multivariable analysis (MVA) were performed to identify predictors of cardiac events. Competing risk of death regression was performed to a model the cumulative incidence of cardiac events. Results: The overall rates of grade ≥3 cardiac events were 24.5% in the NA CRT group versus 10% in the surgery group (P=0.04). On MVA, use of NA CRT (P<0.01, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.45, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.35-9.09) predicted for grade ≥3 cardiac events, though no dosimetric variable predicted for grade ≥3 cardiac events or overall survival. On MVA, NA CRT predicted for pericardial effusions of any grade (P<0.01, HR: 3.70, 95% CI: 1.67-8.33). The V45 Gy was the most significant predictor of pericardial effusions (P=0.012, HR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.06) Conclusions: NA CRT significantly increased the rate of grade ≥3 cardiac events compared with patients treated with surgery alone. Although no dosimetric parameter predicted for grade ≥3 cardiac events or survival, the V45 Gy predicted for pericardial effusions.

Competing Mortality in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors Objectives: Patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are at increased risk of mortality from competing causes in light of the improvement in overall survival over recent decades. The purpose of this study was to explore the competing causes of deaths and the risk factors associated with competing mortality. Materials and Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was used to identify patients diagnosed with NETs between 1973 and 2015. Risk of competing mortality was estimated by the standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and by using the Fine and Gray multivariate regression model. Results: Of the 29,981 NET patients, 42.5% of the deaths that occurred during follow-up were attributed to competing causes (83.9% from noncancer causes and 16.1% from second primary neoplasms). Overall SMR of competing mortality was 2.50 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.43-2.56). The SMR of noncancer causes was 2.65 (95% CI: 2.58-2.73), with the highest risk present within the first year of diagnosis. The SMR of second primary neoplasms was 1.91 (95% CI: 1.79-2.04), with the highest risk observed after 10-year postdiagnosis. A drastic rise in competing mortality was observed in the last decade between 2005 and 2015. Advanced age, black race, small intestinal and gastric NETs, and surgery were significantly associated with competing mortality. Female, pancreatic and recto-anal NETs, distant and regional spread, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were significantly associated with lower competing mortality. Conclusions: Competing mortality plays an increasingly significant role over the years and may hamper efforts made to improve survival outcomes in NET patients.

Patterns of Postdiagnosis Depression Among Late-Stage Cancer Patients: Do Racial/Ethnic and Sex Disparities Exist? Objectives: The incidence of depression after a late-stage cancer diagnosis is poorly understood and has not been the subject of intense investigation. We used population-based data to examine trends in postdiagnosis depression incidence among racial/ethnic and sexual groups. Methods: We identified 123,066 patients diagnosed with late-stage breast, prostate, lung, or colorectal cancer from 2001 to 2013 in the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Medicare-linked database. The primary outcome was the incidence of postdiagnosis depression after a late-stage cancer diagnosis. Trend analysis was performed using the Cochran-Armitage test. Stratified incidence rates were calculated for the racial/ethnic and sexual groups. Results: The incidence of depression after cancer diagnosis increased from 15.3% in 2001 to 24.1% in 2013, Ptrend<0.0001. About 50% of depression was reported in the first 3 months of stage IV cancer diagnosis. A total of 19,775 (20.0%) non-Hispanic whites, 1937 (15.9%) non-Hispanic blacks, and 657 (12.7%) Hispanics were diagnosed with depression during a mean follow-up of 2.7 months (interquartile range: 0.9 to 10.2 mo). The incidence of depression is significantly higher among females than males, 22.7% versus 16.3%, P<0.0001. In the multivariable logistic regression, non-Hispanic whites and females were still independent predictors of higher risk of postdiagnosis depression. Conclusions: There are significant differences in the incidence of postdiagnosis depression among racial/ethnic and sexual groups in the United States. The consideration of racial/ethnic in depression prevention and diagnosis among cancer patients should be discussed as a matter of importance to ensure that there is no diagnosis bias among non-Hispanic blacks and Hispanics.

Surveillance Mammography After Breast Conservation Therapy: Is Tomosynthesis Worth It? Introduction: We investigated the downstream workup and costs associated with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) compared with 2-dimensional full field digital mammogram (FFDM) when employed as initial follow-up imaging in breast conservation therapy. Methods: Between the years 2015 and 2017, 450 consecutive breast conservation therapy patients, ages 32 to 89, with a follow-up DBT (n=162) or FFDM (n=288) were retrospectively reviewed. The primary endpoints were further workup after follow-up mammogram and associated health care costs at 1 year. A single DBT costs an estimated $149 compared with $111 for FFDM, based on Centers for Medicare claims data from the Oncology Care Model. Results: The first posttreatment mammogram was received within 3 (20%), 3 to 6 (32%), or after 6 months (48%) following radiation. Younger patients and those undergoing hypofractionated radiation were more likely to get DBT. There were no differences in stage, receptor status, or mammogram timing between those in the FFDM and DBT groups. The following downstream workup ensued for DBT compared with FFDM imaging: 18% versus 29% short-interval (6-mo) mammogram (odds ratio=1.83, P=0.01), 6% versus 11% breast magnetic resonance imaging (odds ratio=1.90, P=0.08), 4% ultrasound for each, and 3% biopsy for each (1 positive in the FFDM group). Including downstream workup, the estimated cost per patient in the DBT group was $216.14 compared with $237.83 in the FFDM group. Independent predictors for reduced downstream workup per multivariable analysis were the use of DBT and first follow-up mammogram at least 6 months after radiation (P<0.05). Discussion: Excess workup was reduced with DBT compared with FFDM in the posttreatment setting, which translated to an improvement in cost efficiency in this study.