Epidemiology and trends of anaphylaxis in the United States, 2004‐2016
Mohamad R. Chaaban MD, MBA, MSCR Zachary Warren BS Jacques G. Baillargeon PhD Gwen Baillargeon MS Vicente Resto MD, PhD Yong‐Fang Kuo PhD
First published: 04 February 2019 https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22293 Cited by: 1
Potential conflicts of interest: J.B.: AbbVie, Auxilium, Endo, and GlaxoSmithKline, consultant.
Presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, in September 2018.
Read the full text
ePDFPDFTOOLS SHARE
Abstract
Background
No national study has examined the epidemiology of anaphylaxis after introduction of the codes of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐10 CM). Our objective was to examine the trends in incidence and hospitalization rates in the United States utilizing ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 CM codes.
Methods
We used the Clinformatics database from 2004 to 2016. Our outcome measures included incidence of anaphylaxis and hospitalization trends. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the predictors of anaphylaxis and hospitalization.
Results
There were a total of 462,906 anaphylaxis cases. The incidence increased from 153 in 2004 to 218 in 2016 (per 100,000). Women were 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.18‐1.20) times more likely to present with anaphylaxis. Medication‐induced anaphylaxis increased 15‐fold.
Conclusion
This is the first population‐based study that included ICD‐10 CM codes to describe the epidemiology of anaphylaxis in the United States. ICD‐10 codes improved the accuracy of medication‐induced anaphylaxis, the most likely etiology to result in hospitalization.
Mohamad R. Chaaban MD, MBA, MSCR Zachary Warren BS Jacques G. Baillargeon PhD Gwen Baillargeon MS Vicente Resto MD, PhD Yong‐Fang Kuo PhD
First published: 04 February 2019 https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22293 Cited by: 1
Potential conflicts of interest: J.B.: AbbVie, Auxilium, Endo, and GlaxoSmithKline, consultant.
Presented at the American Academy of Otolaryngic Allergy Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, in September 2018.
Read the full text
ePDFPDFTOOLS SHARE
Abstract
Background
No national study has examined the epidemiology of anaphylaxis after introduction of the codes of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health Related Problems, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD‐10 CM). Our objective was to examine the trends in incidence and hospitalization rates in the United States utilizing ICD‐9 and ICD‐10 CM codes.
Methods
We used the Clinformatics database from 2004 to 2016. Our outcome measures included incidence of anaphylaxis and hospitalization trends. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the predictors of anaphylaxis and hospitalization.
Results
There were a total of 462,906 anaphylaxis cases. The incidence increased from 153 in 2004 to 218 in 2016 (per 100,000). Women were 1.19 (95% confidence interval, 1.18‐1.20) times more likely to present with anaphylaxis. Medication‐induced anaphylaxis increased 15‐fold.
Conclusion
This is the first population‐based study that included ICD‐10 CM codes to describe the epidemiology of anaphylaxis in the United States. ICD‐10 codes improved the accuracy of medication‐induced anaphylaxis, the most likely etiology to result in hospitalization.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου