Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve
Amir A. Hakimi BS Jonathan P. Yasmeh MS David S. Foulad MD
First published: 27 May 2019 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13001
Read the full text
ePDFPDFTOOLS SHARE
Abstract
Background/Objective
Online physician‐rating websites are being increasingly used by patients to gauge physicians’ quality of service. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of residency training background of hair restoration surgeons and to identify themes of patient reviews using online physician‐rating portals.
Method
From July 1, 2018 to July 18, 2018, a list of American Board of Hair Restoration Surgery (ABHRS) physicians was compiled. Each member's name was searched on Healthgrades.com and Yelp.com websites, and profile reviews were analyzed for themes of patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
Results
Eighty‐six ABHRS‐certified surgeons were identified on the ABHRS physician directory practicing in the United States. Eleven different residency training backgrounds are represented. Surgeons were given significantly higher ratings on Healthgrades (4.63 vs 3.77, P < 0.001), and nonsurgeons were given significantly higher ratings on Yelp (4.31 vs 4.11, P = 0.036). A total of 567 five‐star reviews and 59 one‐star reviews were analyzed for content across both physician review portals. The most commonly cited topics included results, office staff, physician's bedside manner, comfort during procedure, patient‐perceived physician's honesty, patient‐perceived physician's knowledge, cost/financing options, recovery time, and wait time/scheduling.
Conclusions
Significant, yet inconsistent differences in ratings were found between surgical and nonsurgical residency backgrounds across online physician‐rating portals. Understanding drivers of positive and negative reviews may help surgeons improve patient satisfaction.
Amir A. Hakimi BS Jonathan P. Yasmeh MS David S. Foulad MD
First published: 27 May 2019 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.13001
Read the full text
ePDFPDFTOOLS SHARE
Abstract
Background/Objective
Online physician‐rating websites are being increasingly used by patients to gauge physicians’ quality of service. The objective of this study is to assess the impact of residency training background of hair restoration surgeons and to identify themes of patient reviews using online physician‐rating portals.
Method
From July 1, 2018 to July 18, 2018, a list of American Board of Hair Restoration Surgery (ABHRS) physicians was compiled. Each member's name was searched on Healthgrades.com and Yelp.com websites, and profile reviews were analyzed for themes of patient satisfaction and dissatisfaction.
Results
Eighty‐six ABHRS‐certified surgeons were identified on the ABHRS physician directory practicing in the United States. Eleven different residency training backgrounds are represented. Surgeons were given significantly higher ratings on Healthgrades (4.63 vs 3.77, P < 0.001), and nonsurgeons were given significantly higher ratings on Yelp (4.31 vs 4.11, P = 0.036). A total of 567 five‐star reviews and 59 one‐star reviews were analyzed for content across both physician review portals. The most commonly cited topics included results, office staff, physician's bedside manner, comfort during procedure, patient‐perceived physician's honesty, patient‐perceived physician's knowledge, cost/financing options, recovery time, and wait time/scheduling.
Conclusions
Significant, yet inconsistent differences in ratings were found between surgical and nonsurgical residency backgrounds across online physician‐rating portals. Understanding drivers of positive and negative reviews may help surgeons improve patient satisfaction.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου