Impact of structured report on the quality of preoperative CT staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: assessment of intra- and inter-reader variability Abstract Purpose To evaluate whether a structured radiology report improves the completeness of preoperative CT staging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) compared to conventional free-text reports. Methods We retrospectively included 27 patients (mean age, 64 ± 11.1 years) referred for pancreatic preoperative CT scan for staging of PDA between 2015 and 2018 and in whom a diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma was ultimately confirmed. Four readers independently reported CT scans with both conventional free-text and structured reports. Differences in reported morphologic and vascular features with the two reports were assessed through McNemar Test. Intra-reader and inter-reader were calculated. Results A total of 216 reports were completed by four different readers including 108 free-text and 108 structured reports. Overall, 139 of 540 morphologic characteristics of PDA and 869 of 1188 vascular key features were only described in structured reports. Encasement of left gastric artery, gastroduodenal artery and splenic artery was described in up to 14.8% using free-text reports and in up to 29.6% using structured report, resulting in low-intra-reader agreement (k = 0.033–0.216). Inter-reader agreement improved with structured report compared to free-text one for left gastric artery (ICC = 0.844 vs. ICC = 0.493, respectively), gastroduodenal artery (ICC = 0.730 vs. ICC = 0.449, respectively), portal vein (ICC = 0.847 vs. ICC = 0.638, respectively), portal confluence (ICC = 0.848 vs. ICC = 0.422, respectively) superior mesenteric vein (ICC = 0.765 vs. ICC = 0.695, respectively), and splenic vein (ICC = 0.921 vs. ICC = 0.841, respectively). Conclusion Structured reports for PDA staging significantly reduces the number of missing morphological and vascular features of PDA and improves the inter-reader agreement compared to free-text reports.

Imaging of hepatic hemangioma: from A to Z Abstract The hemangioma is the most common solid lesion of the liver. Therefore, radiologists must know the typical and atypical imaging findings of this lesion in order to reach a correct diagnosis and avoid diagnostic errors. However, only few papers have comprehensively described the entire spectrum of atypical and uncommon imaging features. In this updated review, we provide the imaging features of hepatic hemangioma, in both typical and atypical forms, as well as its association with abnormalities in the adjacent hepatic parenchyma and other hepatic lesions, and its complications.

Clinical significance of isolated abnormal intestinal findings in magnetic resonance enterography in patients with suspected small bowel disease Abstract Purpose Magnetic resonance imaging (MRE) is a well-established adjunct diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of Crohn’s Disease (CD), as ileocolonoscopy can sometimes be falsely reassuring when CD skips distal terminal ileum. We aimed to determine the frequency and clinical significance of isolated abnormal small bowel findings in MRE with normal ileal view in ileoscopy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed findings from 1611 MRE studies that were conducted between 2012 and 2018 to detect patients bearing abnormal intestinal findings and having full ileocolonoscopy. After exclusion of normal or repetitive MRE scans and previously known CD, 147 patients with abnormal MRE detected. MRE scans were categorized as suspicious of CD and non-specific findings. Results Out of 147 patients with abnormal MRE, 122 (83%) had terminal ileum involvement in MRE consistent with ileoscopy findings. Twenty-five (17%) patients were found to have solitarily abnormal intestinal findings in MRE with normal ileoscopy. Only 3 (12%) were diagnosed with CD initially, and all had MRE findings suspicious of CD. The remainder 40% (n = 10) were diagnosed with non-Crohn’s small bowel disease after further investigation, while in the other 48% (n = 12) abnormal MRE findings could not be explained with any organic disease in the follow-up. Conclusion The present study demonstrated that only a small portion of patients with isolated abnormal intestinal findings in MRE is CD, and more than that are non-crohn’s small bowel diseases. These findings, even if they carry the suspicion of CD, do not transform to CD in the long-term follow-up.

Imaging complications of liver transplantation: a multimodality pictorial review Abstract Liver transplantation is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures for the treatment of end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma. Post-transplantation complications include vascular, nonvascular, and biliary. Common imaging techniques used to evaluate the hepatic graft are ultrasonography (US), CT, MR imaging, cholangiography, angiography, and scintigraphy. The purposes of this pictorial review are to review imaging findings of complications of liver transplantation and provide a framework for early detection of post-surgical complications.

Introduction to the special section on rectal cancer

Pathologist’s perspective on primary rectal cancer Abstract Evaluation of primary rectal cancer specimens places the pathologist in a unique position relative to peers, as it is one of the few specimens where the report influences not just patient outcomes but also the quality of the surgical technique itself. With ever-increasing data indicating that the completeness of the mesorectal excision and adequate resection margins are critical for reduced local recurrence rates and improved clinical outcome, the pathologist is faced with the challenge of implementing methods to optimize the evaluation of primary rectal cancers.

Rectal cancer DFP dedicated issue: abdominal radiology

MR staging of anal cancer: what the radiologist needs to know Abstract Anal canal cancer is a rare disease and squamous cell carcinoma is the most common histologic subtype. Traditionally, anal cancer is imaged with CT and PET/CT for purposes of TNM staging. With the increased popularity of MRI for rectal cancer evaluation, MRI has become increasingly utilized for local staging of anal cancer. In this review, we focus on the necessary information radiologists need to know to understand this rare and unique disease and to be familiar with staging of anal cancer on MRI.

Guidelines for MR imaging in rectal cancer: Europe versus United States Abstract The aim of this study was to compare and contrast recently published guidelines for staging and reporting of MR imaging in rectal cancer from the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology and the North American Society of Abdominal Radiology. These guidelines were assessed on the presence of consensus and disagreement. Items were compared by two reviewers, and items with agreement and disagreement between the guidelines were identified and are presented in the current paper. Differences between guidelines are discussed to offer insights in practice variations between both continents and among expert centers, which to some extent may explain the differences between guidelines.

The use of PET/MRI for imaging rectal cancer Abstract Combined PET/MRI is a proposed imaging modality for rectal cancer, leveraging the advantages of MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Rectal cancer PET/MRI protocols typically include dedicated pelvis bed positions utilizing small field-of-view T2-weighted imaging. For staging of the primary tumor, PET/MRI can help delineate the extent of tumor better as well as the extent of tumor beyond the muscularis propria. PET uptake may help characterize small lymph nodes, and the use of hepatobiliary phase imaging can improve the detection of small hepatic metastases. The most beneficial aspect of PET/MRI may be in treatment response, although current data are limited on how to combine PET and MRI data in this setting. Limitations of PET/MRI include the inability to detect small pulmonary nodules and issues related to attenuation correction, although the development of new attenuation correction techniques may address this issue. Overall PET/MRI can improve the staging of rectal cancer, although this potential has yet to be fulfilled.