Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Endorsement of International Consensus Radiochemistry Nomenclature Guidelines

Correction to: 18 F-DOPA PET/CT in brain tumors: impact on multidisciplinary brain tumor board decisions Jérôme Barriere was inadvertently missing in the original version of this article. He has participated to the study design, protocol writing and inclusion of a significant number of patients.

Breaking an unhelpful circle, where innovation and regularia delay clinical practice for patient benefit

EANM Focus 1: one small step for two men, one giant leap for a specialty

One-stop shopping 18 F-FDG PET/CT in a patient with vascular type Behçet’s disease

18 F-FDG uptake of brown fat and cancer: casualty or causality?

Pseudoprogression on PSMA PET imaging of a mCRPC patient under anti-PD1 treatment

Detection of cardiac amyloidosis with 18 F-Florbetaben-PET/CT in comparison to echocardiography, cardiac MRI and DPD-scintigraphy Abstract Purpose Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is a rare cause of heart failure with frequently delayed diagnosis, because specific early signs or symptoms are missing. Recently, direct amyloid imaging using positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has emerged. The aim of this study was to examine the performance of 18F-florbetaben-PET/CT in detection of CA, and compare it to echocardiography (echo), cardiac MRI (CMR) and scintigraphy. Additionally, the use of 18F-florbetaben-PET/CT for quantification of amyloid burden and monitoring of treatment response was assessed. Methods Twenty-two patients with proven (n = 5) or clinical suspicion (n = 17) of CA underwent 18F-florbetaben-PET/CT for diagnostic work-up. Qualitative and quantitative assessment including calculation of myocardial tracer retention (MTR) was performed, and compared to echo (n = 20), CMR (n = 16), scintigraphy (n = 16) and serologic biomarkers (NT-proBNP, cTnT, free light chains). In four patients, follow-up PET/CT was available (after treatment initiation, n = 3; surveillance, n = 1). Results PET demonstrated myocardial 18F-florbetaben retention consistent with CA in 14/22 patients. Suspicion of CA was subsequently dropped in all eight PET-negative patients. Amyloid subtypes showed characteristic retention patterns (AL > AA > ATTR; all p < 0.005). MTR correlated with morphologic and functional parameters, as measured by CMR and echo (all r| > 0.47|, all p < 0.05), but not with cardiac biomarkers. Changes in MTR from baseline to follow-up corresponded well to treatment response, as assessed by cardiac biomarkers and performance status. Conclusions Imaging of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) with 18F-florbetaben-PET/CT is feasible and might be useful in differentiating CA subtypes.

18 F-FPPRGD 2 PET/CT in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer Abstract Purpose The usefulness of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using (18F)-2-fluoropropionyl-labeled PEGylated dimeric arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide [PEG3-E{c(RGDyk)}2] (18F-FPPRGD2) in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) has not been evaluated; therefore, we were prompted to conduct this pilot study. Methods Seven patients with mRCC were enrolled in this prospective study. 18F-FPPRGD2 and 2-deoxy-2-(18F)fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT images were evaluated in a per-lesion analysis. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and tumor-to-background ratio (T/B) were measured for all detected lesions, both before and after starting antiangiogenic therapy. Results Sixty lesions in total were detected in this cohort. SUVmax from 18F-FPPRGD2 PET/CT was lower than that from 18F-FDG PET/CT (4.4 ± 2.9 vs 7.8 ± 5.6, P < 0.001). Both SUVmax and T/B from 18F-FPPRGD2 PET/CT decreased after starting antiangiogenic therapy (SUVmax, 4.2 ± 3.2 vs 2.6 ± 1.4, P = 0.003; T/B, 3.7 ± 3.2 vs 1.5 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). Average changes in SUVmax and T/B were − 29.3 ± 23.6% and − 48.1 ± 28.3%, respectively. Conclusions 18F-FPPRGD2 PET/CT may be an useful tool for monitoring early response to antiangiogenic therapy in patients with mRCC. These preliminary results need to be confirmed in larger cohorts.

Confirmation of the prognostic value of pretherapeutic tumor SUR and MTV in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Abstract Purpose The prognosis for patients with inoperable esophageal carcinoma is still poor and the reliability of individual therapy outcome prediction based on clinical parameters is not convincing. In a recent publication, we were able to show that PET can provide independent prognostic information in such a patient group and that the tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) can improve the prognostic value of tracer uptake values. The present investigation addresses the question of whether the distinctly improved prognostic value of SUR can be confirmed in a similar patient group that was examined and treated at a different site. Methods 18F-FDG PET/CT was performed in 147 consecutive patients (115 male, 32 female, mean age: 62 years) with newly diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma prior to definitive radiochemotherapy. In the PET images, the metabolic active volume (MTV) of the primary tumor was delineated with an adaptive threshold method. For the resulting ROIs, SUVmax and total lesion glycolysis (TLG = MTV × SUVmean) were computed. The blood SUV was determined by manually delineating the aorta in the low-dose CT. SUR values were computed as ratio of tumor SUV and blood SUV. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis with respect to overall survival (OS), distant-metastases-free survival (DM), and locoregional control (LRC) was performed. Additionally, a multivariate Cox regression including clinically relevant parameters was performed. Results Univariate Cox regression revealed MTV, TLG, and SURmax as significant prognostic factors for OS. MTV as well as TLG were significant prognostic factors for LRC while SURmax showed only a trend for significance. None of the PET parameters was prognostic for DM. In univariate analysis, SUVmax was not prognostic for any of the investigated clinical endpoints. In multivariate analysis (T-stage, N-stage, MTV, and SURmax), MTV was an independent prognostic factor for OS and showed a trend for significance for LRC. SURmax was not an independent predictor for OS or LRC. When including the PET parameters separately in multivariate analysis, MTV as well as SURmax were prognostic factors for OS indicating that SURmax is independent from the clinical parameters but not from MTV. In addition, MTV was an independent prognostic factor for LRC in this separate analysis. Conclusions Our study revealed a clearly improved prognostic value of tumor SUR compared to tumor SUV and confirms our previously published findings regarding OS. Furthermore, SUR delivers prognostic information beyond that provided by the clinical parameters alone, but does not add prognostic information beyond that provided by MTV in this patient group. Therefore, our results suggest that pretherapeutic MTV is the parameter of choice for PET-based risk stratification in the considered setting but further investigations are necessary to demonstrate that this suggestion is correct.