Publication date: Available online 13 May 2019
Source: Pathology - Research and Practice
Author(s): Vanessa Cristina Veltrini, Jéssica Araújo Figueira, Gabriela Cristina Santin, Suzana Cantanhede Orsini Machado de Sousa, Ney Soares de Araújo
Abstract
Differential diagnosis among fibrous dysplasias, cemento-ossifying fibromas and cemento-osseous dysplasias is difficult, since there is considerable overlap of histologic features, but also extremely important, since they differ greatly in etiology, clinical behaviour, prognosis and terapeuthic approach. There is no data about the use of immunohistochemistry, a viable and accessible technique, for this purpose. The objective of this study was to investigate, comparatively, the immunohistochemical expression of major non-collagenous proteins (osteonectin [ON], osteopontin [OP], bone sialoprotein [BSP] and osteocalcin [OC]) of mineralized tissue extracellular matrix in 22 cases of fibrous dysplasias, 16 of cemento-ossifying fibromas and 16 of cemento-osseous dysplasias. ON maintained the same expression profile in all cases; the staining for OP was negative in fusiform cells producing cementoid globules and weak, as well as heterogeneous, in high mineralized matrixes; there was negativity for BSP in cementoid globules and in the fusiform cells that produce them, differently from the strong positive expression found in the majority of bone trabeculae and their peripheral cuboidal osteoblasts; and finally, the immuno-reactivity for OC was weak, except in cuboidal osteoblasts and osteocytes. We can conclude that the nature of mineralized structure and the cellular phenotype are much more responsible for variability in immunohistochemical profile than the type of lesion (fibrous dysplasias, cemento-ossifying fibromas and cemento-osseous dysplasias) which makes difficult, at least for a while, the use of these proteins with diagnosis purpose.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου