Injectable profiloplasty: Forehead, nose, lips, and chin filler treatment
Dario Bertossi MD Luca Lanaro MD Irene Dell'Acqua MD Massimo Albanese MD Luciano Malchiodi MD Pier Francesco Nocini MD
First published: 15 November 2018 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12792 Cited by: 1
Funding information:
English review assistance was provided to the authors by ClearView Medical Communications, LLC and funded by Allergan SpA SpA at the request of the investigator. All authors met the ICMJE authorship criteria. Neither honoraria nor payments were made for authorship.
Read the full text
ePDFPDFTOOLS SHARE
Summary
Introduction
We propose a medical filler treatment algorithm of the profile which includes forehead, nose, and chin and to evaluate profilometric results and complications.
Materials and Methods
83 case reviews of associated liquid forehead, nose, and chin plasty performed consecutively from 2014 to 2016. We monitored the horizontal and vertical sagittal stability into two age group: <40 y.o. and >40 y.o. using profilometric Arnett analysis measurements on the F, Gb, Na, Nd, Nt, Sn, ULA, LLA, B, Pg, and Gn soft‐tissue points.
Results
The results at both 3 and 6 months were consistent with the normal ranges indicated by Arnett, with a 0.8 mm maximum of defect/excess. Forehead treatment was performed in 51 (61.4%) patient. Patients >40 y.o. always needed a global correction of the forehead profile. We performed nasal treatment in 83 (100%) patient, acute nasolabial angles was the more frequent nasal defect. The lips were injected in 59 patients (71.1) more frequently >40 y.o. In 83 (100%) patients we perform a chin augmentation. The average advancement of the chin was 3 mm.
Conclusions
The correction of the projection of the forehead, of the profile and shape of the nose, of the lips and chin as well as an overall improvement in face aesthetics and harmony gives a good solution in patients avoiding the need for a surgical intervention, scars and cost of general anesthesia, thus providing the optimum in patient satisfaction.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 1
Pasquale Procacci, Luca Lanaro, Lorenzo Trevisiol, Dario Bertossi, Francesca Zotti, Lonardi Fabio and Antonio D'Agostino, Is post orthognathic maxillary sinusitis related to sino-nasal anatomical alterations?, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.006, 47, 6, (876-882), (2019).
Crossref
Supporting Information
Filename Description
jocd12792-sup-0001-FigS1.tifimage/tif, 1.1 MB
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Dario Bertossi MD Luca Lanaro MD Irene Dell'Acqua MD Massimo Albanese MD Luciano Malchiodi MD Pier Francesco Nocini MD
First published: 15 November 2018 https://doi.org/10.1111/jocd.12792 Cited by: 1
Funding information:
English review assistance was provided to the authors by ClearView Medical Communications, LLC and funded by Allergan SpA SpA at the request of the investigator. All authors met the ICMJE authorship criteria. Neither honoraria nor payments were made for authorship.
Read the full text
ePDFPDFTOOLS SHARE
Summary
Introduction
We propose a medical filler treatment algorithm of the profile which includes forehead, nose, and chin and to evaluate profilometric results and complications.
Materials and Methods
83 case reviews of associated liquid forehead, nose, and chin plasty performed consecutively from 2014 to 2016. We monitored the horizontal and vertical sagittal stability into two age group: <40 y.o. and >40 y.o. using profilometric Arnett analysis measurements on the F, Gb, Na, Nd, Nt, Sn, ULA, LLA, B, Pg, and Gn soft‐tissue points.
Results
The results at both 3 and 6 months were consistent with the normal ranges indicated by Arnett, with a 0.8 mm maximum of defect/excess. Forehead treatment was performed in 51 (61.4%) patient. Patients >40 y.o. always needed a global correction of the forehead profile. We performed nasal treatment in 83 (100%) patient, acute nasolabial angles was the more frequent nasal defect. The lips were injected in 59 patients (71.1) more frequently >40 y.o. In 83 (100%) patients we perform a chin augmentation. The average advancement of the chin was 3 mm.
Conclusions
The correction of the projection of the forehead, of the profile and shape of the nose, of the lips and chin as well as an overall improvement in face aesthetics and harmony gives a good solution in patients avoiding the need for a surgical intervention, scars and cost of general anesthesia, thus providing the optimum in patient satisfaction.
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 1
Pasquale Procacci, Luca Lanaro, Lorenzo Trevisiol, Dario Bertossi, Francesca Zotti, Lonardi Fabio and Antonio D'Agostino, Is post orthognathic maxillary sinusitis related to sino-nasal anatomical alterations?, Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, 10.1016/j.jcms.2019.03.006, 47, 6, (876-882), (2019).
Crossref
Supporting Information
Filename Description
jocd12792-sup-0001-FigS1.tifimage/tif, 1.1 MB
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου