Brain Tumor-Enhancement Visualization and Morphometric Assessment: A Comparison of MPRAGE, SPACE, and VIBE MRI Techniques
L. Danieli, G.C. Riccitelli, D. Distefano, E. Prodi, E. Ventura, A. Cianfoni, A. Kaelin-Lang, M. Reinert and E. Pravatà
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1140-1148; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6096
ArticleFigures & DataSupplementalInfo & MetricsReferences PDF
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Postgadolinium MR imaging is crucial for brain tumor diagnosis and morphometric assessment. We compared brain tumor enhancement visualization and the “target” object morphometry obtained with the most commonly used 3D MR imaging technique, MPRAGE, with 2 other routinely available techniques: sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) and volumetric interpolated brain examination (VIBE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four contrast-enhancing tumors (38 gliomas and 16 metastases) were assessed using MPRAGE, VIBE, and SPACE techniques randomly acquired after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration on a 3T scanner. Enhancement conspicuity was assessed quantitatively by calculating the contrast rate and contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitatively, by consensus visual comparative ratings. The total enhancing tumor volume and between-sequence discrepancy in the margin delineation were assessed on the corresponding 3D target objects contoured with a computer-assisted software for neuronavigation. The Wilcoxon signed rank and Pearson χ2 nonparametric tests were used to investigate between-sequence discrepancies in the contrast rate, contrast-to-noise ratio, visual conspicuity ratings, tumor volume, and margin delineation estimates. Differences were also tested for 1D (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) and 2D (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology) measurements.
RESULTS: Compared with MPRAGE, both SPACE and VIBE obtained higher contrast rate, contrast-to-noise ratio, and visual conspicuity ratings in both gliomas and metastases (P range, <.001–.001). The between-sequence 3D target object margin discrepancy ranged between 3% and 19.9% of lesion tumor volume. Larger tumor volumes, 1D and 2D measurements were obtained with SPACE (P range, <.01–.007). CONCLUSIONS: Superior conspicuity for brain tumor enhancement can be achieved using SPACE and VIBE techniques, compared with MPRAGE. Discrepancies were also detected when assessing target object size and morphology, with SPACE providing more accurate estimates. ABBREVIATIONS: CEL contrast-enhancing lesion GBCA gadolinium-based contrast agent RANO Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology RECIST Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors SPACE sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution TV tumor volume VIBE volumetric interpolated brain examination
Association of Fractional Flow on 3D-TOF-MRA with Cerebral Perfusion in Patients with MCA Stenosis X. Ge, H. Zhao, Z. Zhou, X. Li, B. Sun, H. Wu, J. Wan, J. Xu, J.P. Villablanca and X. Liu American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1124-1131; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6095 ArticleFigures & DataInfo & MetricsReferences PDF Abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fractional flow measured on 3D-TOF-MRA was proposed to quantify cerebral hemodynamic changes in patients with artery stenosis. We investigated the association between fractional flow and cerebral perfusion changes in patients with symptomatic MCA stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and all participants provided written informed consent. From June 2015 to May 2018, four hundred twenty-nine patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis were consecutively recruited and underwent conventional brain MR imaging, 3D-TOF-MRA, and brain CTP. A total of 91 patients with unilateral M1 segment stenosis of the MCA and a stenosis degree of 50%∼99% were included in the analysis. Fractional flow was measured by comparing distal and proximal signal intensity changes across the stenosis on 3D-TOF-MRA. The cutoff value for fractional flow for discriminating between normal perfusion and hypoperfusion was obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve. Associations between fractional flow and hypoperfusion were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The receiver operating characteristic curve showed a significant fractional flow threshold value at 0.90 (sensitivity, 70.1%; 95% CI, 55.9%–81.2%; specificity, 69.6%; 95% CI, 47.6%–84.1%). Participants with a fractional flow of ≤0.90 were independently associated with cerebral hypoperfusion downstream from the stenosis site (adjusted OR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.63–11.62; P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Fractional flow measured on 3D-TOF-MRA may serve as a noninvasive and practical tool for determining the cerebral hypoperfusion in patents with symptomatic MCA stenosis. ABBREVIATIONS: FF fractional flow ICAS intracranial arterial stenosis rMTT relative (affected side/contralateral side) MTT rTTP relative (affected side/contralateral side) TTP SAG-C stressed autoregulation compensated SAG-D stressed autoregulation decompensated SI signal intensity
Wall Contrast Enhancement of Thrombosed Intracranial Aneurysms at 7T MRI T. Sato, T. Matsushige, B. Chen, O. Gembruch, P. Dammann, R. Jabbarli, M. Forsting, A. Junker, S. Maderwald, H.H. Quick, M.E. Ladd, U. Sure and K.H. Wrede American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1106-1111; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6084 ArticleFigures & DataInfo & MetricsReferences PDF This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased. Abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The pathophysiology of wall contrast enhancement in thrombosed intracranial aneurysms is incompletely understood. This in vivo study aimed to investigate wall microstructures with gadolinium-enhanced 7T MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with 14 thrombosed intracranial aneurysms were evaluated using a 7T whole-body MR imaging system with nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced high-resolution MPRAGE. Tissue samples were available in 5 cases, and histopathologic findings were correlated with 7T MR imaging to identify the gadolinium-enhancing microstructures. RESULTS: Partial or complete inner wall enhancement correlated with neovascularization of the inner wall layer and the adjacent thrombus. Additional partial or complete outer wall enhancement can be explained by formation of vasa vasorum in the outer aneurysm wall layer. The double-rim enhancement correlated with perifocal edema and wall histologic findings suggestive of instability. CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct aneurysm wall microstructures responsible for gadolinium enhancement not depictable at lower spatial resolutions can be visualized in vivo using high-resolution gadolinium-enhanced 7T MR imaging.
Gadolinium Enhancement of the Aneurysm Wall in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Aneurysm Instability: A Follow-Up Study M.D.I. Vergouwen, D. Backes, I.C. van der Schaaf, J. Hendrikse, R. Kleinloog, A. Algra and G.J.E. Rinkel American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1112-1116; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6105 ArticleFigures & DataInfo & MetricsReferences PDF This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased. Abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have suggested that gadolinium enhancement of the wall of unruptured intracranial aneurysms on MR imaging may reflect aneurysm wall instability. However, all previous studies were cross-sectional. In this longitudinal study, we investigated whether aneurysm wall enhancement is associated with an increased risk of aneurysm instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all patients 18 years of age or older with ≥1 unruptured aneurysm from the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, who were included in 2 previous studies with either 3T or 7T aneurysm wall MR imaging and for whom it was decided not to treat the aneurysm but to monitor it with follow-up imaging. We investigated the risk of growth or rupture during follow-up of aneurysms with and without gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall at baseline and calculated the risk difference between the 2 groups with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We included 57 patients with 65 unruptured intracranial aneurysms. After a median follow-up of 27 months (interquartile range, 20–31 months), growth (n = 2) or rupture (n = 2) was observed in 4 of 19 aneurysms (21%; 95% CI, 6%–54%) with wall enhancement and in zero of 46 aneurysms (0%; 95% CI, 0%–8%) without enhancement (risk difference, 21%; 95% CI, 3%–39%). CONCLUSIONS: Gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall on MR imaging is associated with an increased risk of aneurysm instability. The absence of wall enhancement makes it unlikely that the aneurysm will grow or rupture in the short term. Larger studies are needed to investigate whether aneurysm wall enhancement is an independent predictor of aneurysm instability. ABBREVIATION: PHASES Population, Hypertension, Age, Size of Aneurysm, Earlier Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from Another Aneurysm, and Site of Aneurysm Assessment of Explicitly Stated Interval Change on Noncontrast Head CT Radiology Reports M. Braileanu, K. Crawford, S.R. Key and M.E. Mullins American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1091-1094; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6081 ArticleFigures & DataInfo & MetricsReferences PDF This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased. Abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Consistent and standardized reporting of interval change for certain diagnoses may improve the clinical utility of radiology reports. The purpose of this study was to assess explicitly stated interval change of various findings in noncontrast head CT reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on successive noncontrast head CT radiology reports from the first 2 weeks of January 2014. Reports with at least 1 prior comparison CT scan were included. Reports with normal examination findings and those that made comparison with only other types of examinations (eg, MR imaging) were excluded. Descriptive and subgroup statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: In total, 200 patients with 230 reports and 979 radiographic findings were identified. The average interval between reports was 344.9 ± 695.9 days (range, 0–3556 days). Interval change was mentioned 67.3% (n = 659) of the time for all findings (n = 979). Explicitly stated interval change was significantly associated with nonremote findings (P < .001) and generalized statements of interval change (P < .001). The proportion of interval change reported ranged from 95.3% of the time for hemorrhagic to 36.4% for soft-tissue/osseous categorizations. CONCLUSIONS: Interval change reporting was variable, mentioned for 67.3% of noncontrast head CT report findings with a prior comparison CT scan. Structured radiology reports may improve the consistent and clear reporting of interval change for certain findings. ABBREVIATION: IC interval change A Practical Review of Functional MRI Anatomy of the Language and Motor Systems V.B. Hill, C.Z. Cankurtaran, B.P. Liu, T.A. Hijaz, M. Naidich, A.J. Nemeth, J. Gastala, C. Krumpelman, E.N. McComb and A.W. Korutz American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1084-1090; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6089 ArticleFigures & DataInfo & MetricsReferences PDF Abstract SUMMARY: Functional MR imaging is being performed with increasing frequency in the typical neuroradiology practice; however, many readers of these studies have only a limited knowledge of the functional anatomy of the brain. This text will delineate the locations, anatomic boundaries, and functions of the cortical regions of the brain most commonly encountered in clinical practice—specifically, the regions involved in movement and language. ABBREVIATIONS: FFA fusiform face area IPL inferior parietal lobule PPC posterior parietal cortex SMA supplementary motor area VOTC ventral occipitotemporal cortex
L. Danieli, G.C. Riccitelli, D. Distefano, E. Prodi, E. Ventura, A. Cianfoni, A. Kaelin-Lang, M. Reinert and E. Pravatà
American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1140-1148; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6096
ArticleFigures & DataSupplementalInfo & MetricsReferences PDF
This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Postgadolinium MR imaging is crucial for brain tumor diagnosis and morphometric assessment. We compared brain tumor enhancement visualization and the “target” object morphometry obtained with the most commonly used 3D MR imaging technique, MPRAGE, with 2 other routinely available techniques: sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) and volumetric interpolated brain examination (VIBE).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four contrast-enhancing tumors (38 gliomas and 16 metastases) were assessed using MPRAGE, VIBE, and SPACE techniques randomly acquired after gadolinium-based contrast agent administration on a 3T scanner. Enhancement conspicuity was assessed quantitatively by calculating the contrast rate and contrast-to-noise ratio, and qualitatively, by consensus visual comparative ratings. The total enhancing tumor volume and between-sequence discrepancy in the margin delineation were assessed on the corresponding 3D target objects contoured with a computer-assisted software for neuronavigation. The Wilcoxon signed rank and Pearson χ2 nonparametric tests were used to investigate between-sequence discrepancies in the contrast rate, contrast-to-noise ratio, visual conspicuity ratings, tumor volume, and margin delineation estimates. Differences were also tested for 1D (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) and 2D (Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology) measurements.
RESULTS: Compared with MPRAGE, both SPACE and VIBE obtained higher contrast rate, contrast-to-noise ratio, and visual conspicuity ratings in both gliomas and metastases (P range, <.001–.001). The between-sequence 3D target object margin discrepancy ranged between 3% and 19.9% of lesion tumor volume. Larger tumor volumes, 1D and 2D measurements were obtained with SPACE (P range, <.01–.007). CONCLUSIONS: Superior conspicuity for brain tumor enhancement can be achieved using SPACE and VIBE techniques, compared with MPRAGE. Discrepancies were also detected when assessing target object size and morphology, with SPACE providing more accurate estimates. ABBREVIATIONS: CEL contrast-enhancing lesion GBCA gadolinium-based contrast agent RANO Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology RECIST Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors SPACE sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts using different flip angle evolution TV tumor volume VIBE volumetric interpolated brain examination
Association of Fractional Flow on 3D-TOF-MRA with Cerebral Perfusion in Patients with MCA Stenosis X. Ge, H. Zhao, Z. Zhou, X. Li, B. Sun, H. Wu, J. Wan, J. Xu, J.P. Villablanca and X. Liu American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1124-1131; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6095 ArticleFigures & DataInfo & MetricsReferences PDF Abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Fractional flow measured on 3D-TOF-MRA was proposed to quantify cerebral hemodynamic changes in patients with artery stenosis. We investigated the association between fractional flow and cerebral perfusion changes in patients with symptomatic MCA stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and all participants provided written informed consent. From June 2015 to May 2018, four hundred twenty-nine patients with symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis were consecutively recruited and underwent conventional brain MR imaging, 3D-TOF-MRA, and brain CTP. A total of 91 patients with unilateral M1 segment stenosis of the MCA and a stenosis degree of 50%∼99% were included in the analysis. Fractional flow was measured by comparing distal and proximal signal intensity changes across the stenosis on 3D-TOF-MRA. The cutoff value for fractional flow for discriminating between normal perfusion and hypoperfusion was obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve. Associations between fractional flow and hypoperfusion were assessed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The receiver operating characteristic curve showed a significant fractional flow threshold value at 0.90 (sensitivity, 70.1%; 95% CI, 55.9%–81.2%; specificity, 69.6%; 95% CI, 47.6%–84.1%). Participants with a fractional flow of ≤0.90 were independently associated with cerebral hypoperfusion downstream from the stenosis site (adjusted OR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.63–11.62; P = .027). CONCLUSIONS: Fractional flow measured on 3D-TOF-MRA may serve as a noninvasive and practical tool for determining the cerebral hypoperfusion in patents with symptomatic MCA stenosis. ABBREVIATIONS: FF fractional flow ICAS intracranial arterial stenosis rMTT relative (affected side/contralateral side) MTT rTTP relative (affected side/contralateral side) TTP SAG-C stressed autoregulation compensated SAG-D stressed autoregulation decompensated SI signal intensity
Wall Contrast Enhancement of Thrombosed Intracranial Aneurysms at 7T MRI T. Sato, T. Matsushige, B. Chen, O. Gembruch, P. Dammann, R. Jabbarli, M. Forsting, A. Junker, S. Maderwald, H.H. Quick, M.E. Ladd, U. Sure and K.H. Wrede American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1106-1111; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6084 ArticleFigures & DataInfo & MetricsReferences PDF This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased. Abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The pathophysiology of wall contrast enhancement in thrombosed intracranial aneurysms is incompletely understood. This in vivo study aimed to investigate wall microstructures with gadolinium-enhanced 7T MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with 14 thrombosed intracranial aneurysms were evaluated using a 7T whole-body MR imaging system with nonenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced high-resolution MPRAGE. Tissue samples were available in 5 cases, and histopathologic findings were correlated with 7T MR imaging to identify the gadolinium-enhancing microstructures. RESULTS: Partial or complete inner wall enhancement correlated with neovascularization of the inner wall layer and the adjacent thrombus. Additional partial or complete outer wall enhancement can be explained by formation of vasa vasorum in the outer aneurysm wall layer. The double-rim enhancement correlated with perifocal edema and wall histologic findings suggestive of instability. CONCLUSIONS: Two distinct aneurysm wall microstructures responsible for gadolinium enhancement not depictable at lower spatial resolutions can be visualized in vivo using high-resolution gadolinium-enhanced 7T MR imaging.
Gadolinium Enhancement of the Aneurysm Wall in Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Is Associated with an Increased Risk of Aneurysm Instability: A Follow-Up Study M.D.I. Vergouwen, D. Backes, I.C. van der Schaaf, J. Hendrikse, R. Kleinloog, A. Algra and G.J.E. Rinkel American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1112-1116; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6105 ArticleFigures & DataInfo & MetricsReferences PDF This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased. Abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have suggested that gadolinium enhancement of the wall of unruptured intracranial aneurysms on MR imaging may reflect aneurysm wall instability. However, all previous studies were cross-sectional. In this longitudinal study, we investigated whether aneurysm wall enhancement is associated with an increased risk of aneurysm instability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included all patients 18 years of age or older with ≥1 unruptured aneurysm from the University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands, who were included in 2 previous studies with either 3T or 7T aneurysm wall MR imaging and for whom it was decided not to treat the aneurysm but to monitor it with follow-up imaging. We investigated the risk of growth or rupture during follow-up of aneurysms with and without gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall at baseline and calculated the risk difference between the 2 groups with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: We included 57 patients with 65 unruptured intracranial aneurysms. After a median follow-up of 27 months (interquartile range, 20–31 months), growth (n = 2) or rupture (n = 2) was observed in 4 of 19 aneurysms (21%; 95% CI, 6%–54%) with wall enhancement and in zero of 46 aneurysms (0%; 95% CI, 0%–8%) without enhancement (risk difference, 21%; 95% CI, 3%–39%). CONCLUSIONS: Gadolinium enhancement of the aneurysm wall on MR imaging is associated with an increased risk of aneurysm instability. The absence of wall enhancement makes it unlikely that the aneurysm will grow or rupture in the short term. Larger studies are needed to investigate whether aneurysm wall enhancement is an independent predictor of aneurysm instability. ABBREVIATION: PHASES Population, Hypertension, Age, Size of Aneurysm, Earlier Subarachnoid Hemorrhage from Another Aneurysm, and Site of Aneurysm Assessment of Explicitly Stated Interval Change on Noncontrast Head CT Radiology Reports M. Braileanu, K. Crawford, S.R. Key and M.E. Mullins American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1091-1094; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6081 ArticleFigures & DataInfo & MetricsReferences PDF This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased. Abstract BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Consistent and standardized reporting of interval change for certain diagnoses may improve the clinical utility of radiology reports. The purpose of this study was to assess explicitly stated interval change of various findings in noncontrast head CT reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on successive noncontrast head CT radiology reports from the first 2 weeks of January 2014. Reports with at least 1 prior comparison CT scan were included. Reports with normal examination findings and those that made comparison with only other types of examinations (eg, MR imaging) were excluded. Descriptive and subgroup statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: In total, 200 patients with 230 reports and 979 radiographic findings were identified. The average interval between reports was 344.9 ± 695.9 days (range, 0–3556 days). Interval change was mentioned 67.3% (n = 659) of the time for all findings (n = 979). Explicitly stated interval change was significantly associated with nonremote findings (P < .001) and generalized statements of interval change (P < .001). The proportion of interval change reported ranged from 95.3% of the time for hemorrhagic to 36.4% for soft-tissue/osseous categorizations. CONCLUSIONS: Interval change reporting was variable, mentioned for 67.3% of noncontrast head CT report findings with a prior comparison CT scan. Structured radiology reports may improve the consistent and clear reporting of interval change for certain findings. ABBREVIATION: IC interval change A Practical Review of Functional MRI Anatomy of the Language and Motor Systems V.B. Hill, C.Z. Cankurtaran, B.P. Liu, T.A. Hijaz, M. Naidich, A.J. Nemeth, J. Gastala, C. Krumpelman, E.N. McComb and A.W. Korutz American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2019, 40 (7) 1084-1090; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6089 ArticleFigures & DataInfo & MetricsReferences PDF Abstract SUMMARY: Functional MR imaging is being performed with increasing frequency in the typical neuroradiology practice; however, many readers of these studies have only a limited knowledge of the functional anatomy of the brain. This text will delineate the locations, anatomic boundaries, and functions of the cortical regions of the brain most commonly encountered in clinical practice—specifically, the regions involved in movement and language. ABBREVIATIONS: FFA fusiform face area IPL inferior parietal lobule PPC posterior parietal cortex SMA supplementary motor area VOTC ventral occipitotemporal cortex
This message was sent to alsfakia@gmail.com.
Unsubscribe from or edit your subscription for this service.
Or by mail: Customer Service * 973 University Avenue * Los Gatos, CA 95032 * U.S.A.
Copyright © 2019 by the American Society of Neuroradiology.
|
Δεν υπάρχουν σχόλια:
Δημοσίευση σχολίου