Comparison of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) for neonatal hearing screening in a hospital with high delivery rate

Publication date: Available online 27 February 2019

Source: International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology

Author(s): Ling Xiu Ngui, Ing Ping Tang, Narayanan Prepageran, Zhun Wieng Lai

Abstract

Introduction

Congenital hearing loss is one of the commonest congenital anomalies. Neonatal hearing screening aims to detect congenital hearing loss early and provide prompt intervention for better speech and language development. The two recommended methods for neonatal hearing screening are otoacoustic emission (OAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR).

Objective

To study the effectiveness of distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) and automated auditory brainstem response (AABR) as first screening tool among non-risk newborns in a hospital with high delivery rate.

Method

A total of 722 non-risk newborns (1444 ears) were screened with both DPOAE and AABR prior to discharge within one month. Babies who failed AABR were rescreened with AABR ± diagnostic auditory brainstem response tests within one month of age.

Results

The pass rate for AABR (67.9%) was higher than DPOAE (50.1%). Both DPOAE and AABR pass rates improved significantly with increasing age (p-value<0.001). The highest pass rate for both DPOAE and AABR were between the age of 36-48 hours, 73.1% and 84.2% respectively. The mean testing time for AABR (13.54 mins +/-7.47) was significantly longer than DPOAE (3.52 mins +/-1.87), with a p-value of <0.001.

Conclusions

OAE test is faster and easier than AABR, but with higher false positive rate. The most ideal hearing screening protocol should be tailored according to different centre.

from ORL via a.sfakia on Inoreader https://ift.tt/2T9zHfr